Reactions occurred on both sides. Leal's relatives burned an American flag and feebly criticized the American justice system. Leal's attorney said that consular help would have freed him. However, the Supreme Court voted The Texas Attorney General stated officially that the attempts to review Leal's appeals were an effort to evade justice. Sauceda's family concurred in a simple, logical statement: "A technicality doesn't give anyone the right to come to this country and rape, torture, and murder anyone."
So, we all have to wonder to ourselves, who is the Obama Administration representing? The U.S. that is letting him use the White House, or the Mexican government that he's allowing its citizens to undermine and violate the rights and rules of the United States, even if the broken laws are criminal? I think that this event only shows further that he fails to even represent the interests of the American people. If he would sooner place international relations before criminal justice, should we allow this man to continue his presidency? He only promotes the Democrat ideal of corruption and ignorance, and continuing his presidency would doom this nation and it's citizens.
You know what, Leal's relatives? You need to learn to face facts and learn that there is law in every nation. You think that your family member should walk on a crime that violates every social norm on the grounds of his citizenship? Your argument for fairness was futile, and already has been confirmed as an attempt for him to walk on murder. He wasn't going to walk as soon as he confessed to murder. And on top of that, you burned an American flag. So I will post a picture of an American burning the Mexican flag. Actually, there are a bunch of videos of this on YouTube, but this is completely out of spite. His death was a byproduct of law and order, not corruption. It is more disturbing to let him walk on a crime that no man should walk.
No comments:
Post a Comment